<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blazers Trade Rumors (Channing Frye for David Lee (Knicks))</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aboutitall.com/2009/01/05/blazers-trade-rumors-channing-frye-for-david-lee-knicks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aboutitall.com/2009/01/05/blazers-trade-rumors-channing-frye-for-david-lee-knicks/</link>
	<description>-- An Oregon Perspective --</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 08:42:10 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.aboutitall.com/2009/01/05/blazers-trade-rumors-channing-frye-for-david-lee-knicks/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aboutitall.com/2009/01/05/blazers-trade-rumors-channing-frye-for-david-lee-knicks/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>im a die hard blazers fan
i undrstand channing frye could be dominant 
but there&#039;s no time for him to play
he&#039;s 3rd in the center rotation
and behind aldrige in the 4 rotation.
lee is an explosive player that could be the missing link
for a surging blazers team to a playoff win.
i like the frye deal, but hope they keep bayless</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im a die hard blazers fan<br />
i undrstand channing frye could be dominant<br />
but there&#8217;s no time for him to play<br />
he&#8217;s 3rd in the center rotation<br />
and behind aldrige in the 4 rotation.<br />
lee is an explosive player that could be the missing link<br />
for a surging blazers team to a playoff win.<br />
i like the frye deal, but hope they keep bayless</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.aboutitall.com/2009/01/05/blazers-trade-rumors-channing-frye-for-david-lee-knicks/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 02:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aboutitall.com/2009/01/05/blazers-trade-rumors-channing-frye-for-david-lee-knicks/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>DO NOT TRADE CHANNING FRYE. HE WILL BECOME DOMINANT IF HE GETS JUST A LITTLE MORE TIME</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DO NOT TRADE CHANNING FRYE. HE WILL BECOME DOMINANT IF HE GETS JUST A LITTLE MORE TIME</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.aboutitall.com/2009/01/05/blazers-trade-rumors-channing-frye-for-david-lee-knicks/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aboutitall.com/2009/01/05/blazers-trade-rumors-channing-frye-for-david-lee-knicks/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Yes they do. Until Oden can get his fowling under control, its all up to pryzbilla. Adding Lee would definitly be appreciated and take some pressure off. I hope the blazers dont trade bayless though, hes got a future</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes they do. Until Oden can get his fowling under control, its all up to pryzbilla. Adding Lee would definitly be appreciated and take some pressure off. I hope the blazers dont trade bayless though, hes got a future</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forest</title>
		<link>http://www.aboutitall.com/2009/01/05/blazers-trade-rumors-channing-frye-for-david-lee-knicks/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Forest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aboutitall.com/2009/01/05/blazers-trade-rumors-channing-frye-for-david-lee-knicks/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>this trade sounds really good for all three teams, Wilson Chandler is a legit starting forward for the Knicks,so parting with Q wouldn&#039;t really make too big of a difference.
and getting Frye and Camby BACK would be beneficial to them

Portland could really use David Lee(you gotta love this guy)
i&#039;m pretty sure any team would love to have him, but Portland really needs toughness and skill for there team
and parting with Channing Frye for Lee..i see as being an upgrade

and the clips dont really need camby, when they already have Kamen and Zach Randolph

this trade could make all 3 teams ALOT better</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this trade sounds really good for all three teams, Wilson Chandler is a legit starting forward for the Knicks,so parting with Q wouldn&#8217;t really make too big of a difference.<br />
and getting Frye and Camby BACK would be beneficial to them</p>
<p>Portland could really use David Lee(you gotta love this guy)<br />
i&#8217;m pretty sure any team would love to have him, but Portland really needs toughness and skill for there team<br />
and parting with Channing Frye for Lee..i see as being an upgrade</p>
<p>and the clips dont really need camby, when they already have Kamen and Zach Randolph</p>
<p>this trade could make all 3 teams ALOT better</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
